mirror of
https://github.com/azure/login.git
synced 2026-03-13 18:17:09 -04:00
45b10ffd19
* Bump lodash from 4.17.15 to 4.17.19 (#52) Bumps [lodash](https://github.com/lodash/lodash) from 4.17.15 to 4.17.19. - [Release notes](https://github.com/lodash/lodash/releases) - [Commits](https://github.com/lodash/lodash/compare/4.17.15...4.17.19) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Amruta Kawade <65217380+AmrutaKawade@users.noreply.github.com> * Bump @actions/core from 1.1.3 to 1.2.6 (#60) Bumps [@actions/core](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/tree/HEAD/packages/core) from 1.1.3 to 1.2.6. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/blob/main/packages/core/RELEASES.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/commits/HEAD/packages/core) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Amruta Kawade <65217380+AmrutaKawade@users.noreply.github.com> * updating node_nodules * updated package-lock Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
validate-npm-package-license
Give me a string and I'll tell you if it's a valid npm package license string.
var valid = require('validate-npm-package-license');
SPDX license identifiers are valid license strings:
var assert = require('assert');
var validSPDXExpression = {
validForNewPackages: true,
validForOldPackages: true,
spdx: true
};
assert.deepEqual(valid('MIT'), validSPDXExpression);
assert.deepEqual(valid('BSD-2-Clause'), validSPDXExpression);
assert.deepEqual(valid('Apache-2.0'), validSPDXExpression);
assert.deepEqual(valid('ISC'), validSPDXExpression);
The function will return a warning and suggestion for nearly-correct license identifiers:
assert.deepEqual(
valid('Apache 2.0'),
{
validForOldPackages: false,
validForNewPackages: false,
warnings: [
'license should be ' +
'a valid SPDX license expression (without "LicenseRef"), ' +
'"UNLICENSED", or ' +
'"SEE LICENSE IN <filename>"',
'license is similar to the valid expression "Apache-2.0"'
]
}
);
SPDX expressions are valid, too ...
// Simple SPDX license expression for dual licensing
assert.deepEqual(
valid('(GPL-3.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)'),
validSPDXExpression
);
... except if they contain LicenseRef:
var warningAboutLicenseRef = {
validForOldPackages: false,
validForNewPackages: false,
spdx: true,
warnings: [
'license should be ' +
'a valid SPDX license expression (without "LicenseRef"), ' +
'"UNLICENSED", or ' +
'"SEE LICENSE IN <filename>"',
]
};
assert.deepEqual(
valid('LicenseRef-Made-Up'),
warningAboutLicenseRef
);
assert.deepEqual(
valid('(MIT OR LicenseRef-Made-Up)'),
warningAboutLicenseRef
);
If you can't describe your licensing terms with standardized SPDX identifiers, put the terms in a file in the package and point users there:
assert.deepEqual(
valid('SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txt'),
{
validForNewPackages: true,
validForOldPackages: true,
inFile: 'LICENSE.txt'
}
);
assert.deepEqual(
valid('SEE LICENSE IN license.md'),
{
validForNewPackages: true,
validForOldPackages: true,
inFile: 'license.md'
}
);
If there aren't any licensing terms, use UNLICENSED:
var unlicensed = {
validForNewPackages: true,
validForOldPackages: true,
unlicensed: true
};
assert.deepEqual(valid('UNLICENSED'), unlicensed);
assert.deepEqual(valid('UNLICENCED'), unlicensed);